The subject of the economy is infected with a dualism (purposely bred by schools and institutions) that prevents people from perceiving that the very subject of the economy is a battleground to be broached; broached with all of our common mess beating down the financial wizards that spew incomprehensible gibberish; not a disconnected thing concerned in some pure sense with material well-being, but the materialized enactments of man, through human law, toward his brother and sister. An economy is intrinsically socially constructed.
Because an economy has more to do with it than "finance", it means that "finance" becomes more important than we figured before, not less so. The material impoverishment of people is not a concern that is pitted against the primary concern of spiritual salvation. They are not one and the same, but neither are they to be pitted against each other.
You are infected with a dualism (which keeps your faith sealed up like an antique) if your first reaction is to say that it is liberation theology.
The rich don't simply get richer while the poor become poorer, like it was some horrible but ultimately accidental coincidence. The rich get richer precisely because the poor are made to become poorer - and not just through theft and usury; but through the corruption of the meanings of words.
That is what money-as-debt is.
That is what the gold standard has ever been, and would ever be.
Pyramid schemes trying to fool us into believing that money exists by nature, when money only ever exists by law.
They don't want us to ever see the truth of what monetization is: a group of people deciding through a primary transaction made law, how many are going to be able to make transactions; or else a group of people deciding through a primary transaction made law, that the common good will be included to the exclusion of anyone making profit from that primary transaction made law. Usury or beneficence of the common good. It's one or the other.
Know people who advocate the gold standard? Ask them if they have personal investments in gold.
And wouldn't that be nice for owners of gold to become the monetizers of other people's real wealth and productions.
Anyways, a government of a nation must issue its own money debt-free according to the good produced and the quantity in circulation controlled through extinguishing (which is really the only reason we would need a tax, and is in fact why taxes ever came about).
Nope, that is not a "planned economy". It is merely the government monetizing the wealth that the people produce.
The gold standard is very much planned though.