Subsidiarity is not the breaking down of a power into smaller and smaller units, but a power whose issuance is fully expended, fully spent, into a corporeal work which creates another body. This is what a government printing its own money and then spending it into existence through infrastructure is about: Catholic teaching.
The gold standard is the implementation of the law of the jungle and the turning over of creativity, time, energy, labour and invention to the bondage of an idol.
Update: Bitcoin is Kitcoin. It is the eradication of "who". The money issue is not a money issue. It is a national sovereignty issue. Free trade is not trade.
Update II:  The Magic Isle of Guernsey, By Bill Still:
The
 simple fact is that a nation's money should be created in the public 
interest. Unfortunately, that is not the case today in almost every 
nation on earth. Money creation is given over to private banks through 
the deception that it is being created in the public interest by 
national central banks such as the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, 
Bank de France, Deutsche Bundesbanke, etc.
Many
 believe that the only solution is a return to gold-backed money. I do 
not agree. I think this is yet another deception and I believe world 
monetary history proves this incontrovertibly. To me, the main point to 
remember is that it is not what backs the national money that is 
important; what is important is Who controls the quantity!
Despite
 the nationalistic-sounding names of these central banks, don't be 
deceived; they do not create money in the public interest. Every dollar, 
every pound, every euro is created as an interest bearing debt - 
primarily owed to - and the quantity controlled by - the commercial 
banking community.
The reason solution is two-fold:
1. Forbid government borrowing - no more national debt. Nations do not have to borrow. Nations can create their own money.
2. Forbid fractional reserve lending. This is where banks can lend 
out 10 to 12 times the money they actually have. Banks must go to 
"full-reserve lending".
In other words, the only way to end this worldwide spiral of 
depression is for every nation to return to a debt-free money system. Without the money power firmly in its control no nation can really be 
sovereign. In fact, creating money in the public interest is the very 
definition of sovereignty.
Fortunately, this is not a new or radical idea. It has been used 
hundreds of times throughout history, but every time it has been 
employed, it has been attacked mercilessly by the big banking class who 
lose profits whenever the idea of money creation in the public interest 
surfaces. So, this is a timeless struggle and nothing less than survival 
of the human species is at stake, because the debt the current system is
 generating is the primary cause of the world's hunger, poverty and 
misery, and is quickly destroying sovereign democratic governments and 
returning humanity to a nouveau-serfdom system from which it will soon 
be unable to escape.
Debt-free money creation has been going on in the tiny island of Guernsey for 200 years. Lets take a look.
Despite the fact that the island of Guernsey has only 30 square miles
 and a population of only 65,000 people and very little in the way of 
natural resources except cows; their per capita income is $40,000 per 
year, 9th highest among the 200 or so countries of the world. What 
gives? Guernsey has used a money system since 1817 that can serve as a 
model for the rest of the world to use to escape the ongoing depression 
of the 21st century.
Despite it's proximity to France, Guernsey is actually a British 
Crown Dependency and, to it's credit, has never joined the European 
Union. After the Napoleonic Wars, Guernsey was in dire straits. The 
island's roads were mere cart tracks, only 54-inches wide. In wet 
weather they were virtually impassable. There was not a vehicle for hire
 of any kind on the island. There was no trade, nor much hope of 
employment among the poor. The sea was washing away large tracts of land
 due to the sorry state of the dykes.
Guernsey, like most nations at that time (as well as today) had 
borrowed heavily from the banks. The States Debt was £19,137 with an 
annual interest charge of £2,390, but the gross national revenue of the 
entire island was only £3,000, leaving only paltry £610 per annum to run
 the entire island. In other words, interest paid to banks consumed 80% 
of the  GDP, thus reducing the populace to a state of pitiful serfdom.
In 1815, a committee of well-respected public spirited elders was 
assembled to finance the building of a public market near the the main 
harbor, Saint Peter Port, so the farmers could more easily sell their 
products for export. The cost of the new facility would be £6,000. In 
addition, fixing the dykes would cost an additional £10,000.
Further taxation of the impoverished island was impossible. Borrowing
 money from the banks would result in even higher interest charges that 
could never be paid. The committee made a historic recommendation to 
remedy this dire situation.
The committee recommends that the expense should be met by 
the issue of State Notes of £1 sterling to the value of £6,000.... and 
that these notes will be available not only for the payment of the new 
market, but also for Torteval Church, roads to construct, and other 
expenses of the States.
The committee argued that there was little to fear from inflation 
because the local banks already had £50,000 of their money (notes) in 
circulation. As a further protection against inflation, the overly 
cautious citizens of Guernsey placed redemption dates on the notes of 
April 1817, October 1817, and April 1818. In other words these notes were
 good for payment of taxes and good as regular money in circulation 
until the expiration date was reached. At that time, the notes would no 
longer be legal tender and the state would destroy them.
In this manner, without increasing the States' debt, it will 
be possible to finish these works, leaving sufficient money in the 
Exchequer for other needs.ii
Once the good citizens realised that these notes would work without 
the skies falling on the gentle island, additional issues took place in 
1820 and 1821. By 1821, some £10,000 of Guernsey notes were in 
circulation, all created without debt.
[It was] the most advantageous method of meeting debts, from 
the point of view both of the public and the states finances. Indeed, the
 public seemed to realise this fact, and, far from being averse to 
taking the notes, they sought them out eagerly.iii
The citizenry clearly understood that these Guernsey Notes were 
clearly government financing in the public interest. They also realised 
that if there were to be any inflation as a result, at least it was 
better than no money at all, and at least they could all  shoulder the 
inflation equally.
In 1824, another £5,000 notes were issued for the markets, and in 
1826 £20,000 to erect Elizabeth College and certain other schools.
In the bill d'Etat it was a frequent subject for 
congratulation; and it was stated over and over again by imminent men of
 those times that without the issue of States' notes, important public 
works, such as roads and buildings could not possibly have been carried 
out. Yet by means of the States' issue, not only were these works 
accomplished, but also the island was not a penny the poorer in interest
 charges. Indeed, the improvements had stimulated the flow of visitors 
to the island, and with increased trade, the island enjoyed its new-found
 prosperity.iv
In 126, however, the first signs of opposition by the banking 
community began. A complaint was lodged with the British Privy Council 
that Guernsey had no right to issue debt-free notes. However the 
Guernsey (also known as the 'States') Financial committee explained the 
situation to the satisfaction of all, and the matter was closed.
In the next year, surprise, surprise, a new commercial bank opened, 
called "Old Bank". They began printing up private bank notes in such 
quantity that the island became flooded with money. Soon Guernsey feared
 that inflation would set in - or worse that their own debt-free money 
experiment would be blamed for the inflation. So a committee was 
appointed to confer with the banks. What went on in these meetings 
remains a mystery to this day; but the result was that £15,000 of 
Guernsey Notes would be withdrawn from circulation and the government 
would be limited to issuing a grand total of only £40,000 of their own 
notes. This agreement remained in force until World War 1.
In the wake of World War 1, the banks came under severe restrictions 
on how much money they could issue. All bank money was being directed 
towards the war effort. But Guernsey was under no such restriction, 
probably because its experiment was unique, and perhaps forgotten.
Guernsey made good use of her opportunity. By the end of the war, in 
1918, Guernsey had issued £14,000, and 40 years later, that had grown to
 £542,765. Today, private bank notes no longer exist. British money 
circulates side by side with State Notes.
Naturally, there is a greater demand for the State Notes; no 
sane citizen of Guernsey wishes to pay debt charges! To enlarge on this 
theme: In 1937 the States Note money, about £175,000, cost the States 
only £450 for printing and handling. A loan of the same dimensions would
 have about £11,383 annually. So can you blame the Guernsey taxpayers 
for preferring their own money since, under their sensible and benevolent financial system, they pay hardly any income tax.v
During the entire experiment in Guernsey, from
 1817 to date, there has at no time been a threat of inflation from the 
creation of State Notes. At all times, the States were very careful in 
the issue and cancellation of notes according to their ability and 
requirements.vi
Today, Guernsey remains an island of prosperity. As author Ellen Brown puts it:
Guernsey has an income tax, but that tax is relatively low (a
 "flat" 20%), and it is simple and loophole free. It has no inheritance tax,
 no capital gains tax, and no federal debt. Commercial banks service 
private [lending], but the government itself never goes into debt.
When it wants to create some private work or service, it just
 issues the money it needs to pay for the work. The Guernsey government 
has been issuing it's own money for nearly two centuries. During that 
time, the money supply has mushroomed to about 25 times its original 
size; yet the economy has not been troubled by price inflation, and it 
has remained prosperous and stable.viii
Once you understand the Guernsey story, you have to admire the modesty of their website:
Guernsey's ability to look after its own fiscal affairs has 
meant that it has been able to foster a favourable tax climate. This has 
led to many offshore banks, fund managers and insurance companies 
establishing here. Whilst the traditional industries of flower growing, 
fishing and dairy farming still playing an important part, contributing 
both to the varied economy and to the islands character.
Guernsey also has its own stamps and currency, and while the 
British pounds can be used on the island, Guernsey pounds cannot be used
 in the UK.!
But the question may arise,what keeps them from printing too much. 
They watch inflation closely, and the calculations are all completely 
transparent, run by a committee of citizens, and open for all to see on 
their website.
That's all they care about; Is this causing inflation? They expand as
 much as they want as long as it causes no inflation. They don't care 
about theory. Born out of desperate need, they found out the secret of 
money and have quietly gone about using it and thereby have a high 
standard of living and very low taxes.
Fortunately, the Guernsey experiment is not an aberration. It has 
been tried time and time again, and when the quantity is controlled in 
the public interest, always with success. The bankers, however, 
inevitably attack these in-the-public-interest, debt -free government 
issues of money. Debt-free money is in everyone's interest except 
bankers'. Typically, they will use their money and influence to create 
some financial emergency then bribe sufficient politicians to convince 
them to vote for legislation giving the bankers monopoly on issuing all 
the nation's money as a loan, thereby stripping the nation of its 
ability to issue its own money debt free.
During the depths of depression of the 1930's, the majority of 
economists in the US discovered this monetary reform solution. In 1936, 
Frank D. Graham, professor of economics at Princetown University offered
 his perspective in the American Economic Review:
"What we need is not control of banking but a government 
monopoly of the supply of money, with commercial banks left to lend on 
short-term...out of capital funds, debenture borrowings, and real time 
deposits. Such a system... is a[n] indispensable prerequisite to 
regulation of the money supply on which all attempts to bring greater 
stability into our economic system, through monetary means, must 
inevitably be based. We are certainly not likely to get stability so 
long as the supply of money remains even partially in the hands of those
 who have no responsibility for the total issue and no motive to do 
other than increase it as far as law, and a merely selfish prudence, 
will permit.
There is a way for citizens and their governments to take back the 
money-creation power of the banks. Yes, bankers are experts with money, 
but they are experts in maximizing their profits and rarely have much 
interest in the public interest. Freeing your government from borrowing 
money from bankers is the first, and most important, step for national 
freedom and prosperity. It is also THE most important step to limiting 
governmental overspending. If a government cannot borrow, it MUST live 
within its means.
Debt-free, government issued money - where the quantity is properly 
controlled in the public interest- has always worked to promote low 
taxation and maximise freedom for the majority of the nation.
i Grubiak, Olive and Jan; The Guernsey Experiment ( 1960, 1999 reprint, Bloomsfield Books, Sudbury, England ), p.8.
ii ibid
iii ibid
iv ibid, p. 8-9
v, p.11
vi ibid, p 11-12
vii ibid, p.12
viii Brown, Ellen h., Web of Debt, ( Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Third Millenium Press, 2007), . p. 100-101
From the Sovereign Independent June 2011
Bill Still has a book out called No More National Debt: www.billstill.com
 
 
 
1 comment:
Merry Christmas everybody!
Post a Comment