Saturday, June 16, 2012

They like calling it entering enemy territory as a spy


Back when the Lie-la Rose debate first burst onto the blogosphere, a defender of Live Action - who later became proficient in filling people's inboxes with subject lines roughly tantamount to, "SEND ME MONEY OR THE BABIES DIE!!!!!!!!!", and the slightly more awkward, "PROVE TO ME YOU'RE NOT AN ENEMY OF MY MINISTRY OF SAVING BABIES BY SENDING ME MONEY!!!!!!!" - came out in their defense with the example of spies crossing enemy territory in time of war to gain precious information, the obtaining of which the stakes of the entire universe depend upon!!!!!

And what is the "information" they are gaining? Precisely "information" of which the production - that is, the creation of the actual information - is inherently bound to the actions of the ones supposedly digging it up. They are digging up no information. But they are acting like a bunch of jackasses on camera, like little kids playing knicky-knicky-nine-door; lying in the process and holding it up as the thing without which we would never have known about such and such corrupt practices (as though an industry that kills babies could do anything that's not corrupt) of Planned Parenthood - which is a bunch of tosh.

Take gendercide. This has been known for quite some time without Live Action's stupid "covert operations". And those that do think abortion is great and wonderful don't bat an eye at the fact that there are parents who prefer to have a boy over a girl - which, by the way, is the way in which these people phrase it: not that they hate girls (though hating girls holds true for certain barbaric cultures), but that they would prefer to have a boy, thank you please if you don't mind since it saves us from providing a dowry.

If you can kill your child, you can kill your child for any reason. If you can kill your child - indeed, are practically coerced by doctors to kill your child - because the child has Down's Syndrome, then you can kill your child because your child would interfere with your plans for vacation, then you can kill your child because you're too young, then you can kill your child because the child was conceived in rape, then you can kill your child because the child won't have blue eyes or brown eyes, then you can kill your child because who would want to bring a child into this world, then you can kill your child because doing so would mean Gaia will bless you for preventing another carbon footprint, then you can kill your child because it won't be a boy - which, again, is the way that gendercidal parents phrase it: not that they hate girls, but that it won't be a boy, and they prefer to have a boy.

Planned Parenthood is an industry. They make money by killing babies, and anything that gets more babies killed is their aim. It is the population controllers who ultimately are deliberately seeking to kill girls - as a specific agenda. The Catholic Church condemns the creation of children in which the marital act is removed. Nonetheless, it is a sad fact in today's world that children can be brought about with just a supply of the stuff from men, but it still requires a woman to bring a child to term.

The population controllers can reduce populations through general abortion, but because it takes women to bring children to birth, the population controllers can irretrievably decimate entire populations by targeting the girls in particular.

1 comment:

love the girls said...

The information was known, but the information was not in a scandal format to make it marketable so as to get results.

Lila Rose put it in a format which made it marketable as proved by the media coverage of a subject well known to anyone in the right to life movement.

The results, (like virtually all scandals in the modern world), are only good one time because after that any scandal becomes passe and accepted.

I appreciate what Lila Rose did, even though the effect on the populace lasted for only a moment before being lost in the sensual saturated mass media.